Esofagitis flemonosa aguda, a propósito de un caso / No disponible

No disponible

Eosinophilic esophagitis.

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic, eosinophil-predominant inflammatory condition that can affect esophageal mucosa at any age. Distinguished from gastroesophageal reflux disease in the mid 1990's, it has seemed to be increasingly prevalent, and is usually a manifestation of food allergy. The endoscopic and histologic features are well described. The clinical manifestations vary considerably by age, with adolescents and adults complaining primarily of dysphagia. Younger children may present with pain, vomiting, other evidence for food allergy, or feeding difficulties. Treatment options include swallowed (non-systemic) steroids and dietary antigen elimination, and must be maintained indefinitely due to the extremely high rate of recurrence off therapy. The complications of untreated disease include fibrosis of the esophageal lamina propria and stricture formation that result in chronic dysphagia, risking food impaction and perforation.

Food allergy and eosinophilic esophagitis.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic allergic disease of the esophagus. A mix of immediate, IgE-mediated and delayed, non-IgE-mediated immunological reactions to foods is thought to play a role in EoE. Our purpose is to review available clinical and research evidence for this link between food allergy and EoE. RECENT FINDINGS: Various food elimination trials resulted in various rates of disease remission. Exclusive amino acid formula-based dietary trials resulted in more than 90% remission in children with EoE. Empiric elimination diets consisting of avoidance of foods commonly known to cause hypersensitivity reactions resulted in 50-74% disease remission. When diets were tailored based on results from skin prick and atopy patch tests, remission rates were comparable. Translational research studies performed on esophageal tissues and peripheral blood of patients with EoE demonstrated an allergic T-helper type 2 phenotype, though mechanisms linking the disease to food allergens are not fully addressed. SUMMARY: Foods appear to be important allergic triggers in EoE. Identification of these triggers, however, remains a challenge. Research is needed to elucidate at which point in the pathogenesis of EoE foods become important so that their role can be better understood, and develop better tests to identify these foods.

Eosinophilic oesophagitis in adults.

Previously considered a rare condition, eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE) has become increasingly recognized as an important cause of dysphagia and food impactions in adults. This is likely attributable to a combination of an increasing incidence of EoE and a growing awareness of the condition. EoE may occur in isolation or in conjunction with eosinophilic gastroenteritis. However, the burgeoning field is likely attributable to the variant that uniquely affects the oesophagus. Adults classically present with symptoms of dysphagia, food impactions, and heartburn. Typical endoscopic features include concentric mucosal rings, linear furrowing, white plaques or exudates and a narrow caliber oesophagus. In some cases, the endoscopic features may appear normal. For years, EoE went unrecognized because eosinophilic infiltration was accepted as a manifestation of reflux, which continues to be a confounding factor in some patients. Current consensus is that the diagnosis of EoE is established by 1) the presence of symptoms, especially dysphagia and food impactions in adults, 2) > or =15 eosinophils per high power field in oesophageal tissue, and 3) exclusion of other disorders with similar presentations such as GERD. Current understanding of EoE pathophysiology and natural history are limited but the entity has been increasingly linked to food allergies and aeroallergens. The main treatment options for EoE are proton pump inhibitors, dietary manipulation, and topical or oral glucocorticoids. This review highlights recent insights into EoE in adults although, clearly, much of the available data overlap with pediatrics and, occasionally, with eosinophilic gastroenteritis.

Nutritional management of children who have food allergies and eosinophilic esophagitis.

Over the past decade, eosinophilic esophagitis has become increasingly prevalent in the United States. One of the effective treatment approaches is dietary management, which aims to eliminate exposure to food allergens. Approaches to dietary management include the use of elemental diets, elimination diets, and tailored elimination diets, each of which poses potential nutrition risks. The benefits and potential downsides of each treatment are discussed in detail. Regardless of the diet therapy selected, a complete nutrition assessment by a registered dietitian with expertise in the management of food allergies is recommended for all patients diagnosed with eosinophilic esophagitis.

Eosinophilic esophagitis -- clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and treatment

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EE) is a chronic inflammatory, immunoallergicdisease of the esophagus that represents the mostcommon eosinophilic gut disease. Understanding and diagnosisregarding this condition have greatly increased in recent years,particularly in Europe and North America, in parallel with otherallergic disorders. It consists of dense esophageal infiltrationwith eosinophils in the absence of gastro-esophageal reflux(GER). It involves individuals at all ages, and is particularly commonin males during childhood and up to the 5th decade of life.It manifests with chronic, intermittent esophageal symptomsthat predominantly include dysphagia, food impactionepisodes, and GER-attributable complaints that do not respondto antisecretory therapy.Endoscopically, EE is a polymorphous disease that presentswith various changes in esophageal caliber, and subtle changesin mucosal appearance, which lead to biopsy collection as a keyprocedure for diagnosis. Management must be multidisciplinary,including gastroenterologists, pathologists, allergologists,and also nutrition specialists in pediatric cases.Regarding therapy, dietary food restrictions are especiallyuseful in the management of pediatric EE, but effectiveness islower in the adult, maybe because of a greater involvement ofair allergens. Drug use is standard, particularly involving topicalsteroids, which may revert manifestations and histological lesions,even though recurrence following discontinuation is common(AU)

Nutritional management of eosinophilic esophagitis.

Eosinophilic esophagitis has been increasingly described in pediatric and adult literature. Several pediatric studies have indicated that food allergies are responsible for more than 90% of pediatric cases. There are three different dietary approaches to the management of eosinophilic esophagitis: (1) the elemental diet, (2) the removal of foods based on allergy testing, and (3) the removal of the foods that most commonly cause eosinophilic esophagitis. This article discusses the nutritional risks and benefits of each approach.

Eosinophilic esophagitis: is it all allergies?

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EE) is an increasingly recognized disorder in the adult population, most often manifested by symptoms of dysphagia and food impaction. Mechanisms involving eotaxin-3, interleukin 5, and signal transducer and activator of transcription 6 have been studied and may represent future therapeutic targets. Patients commonly have a personal and family history of atopy, and both food allergies and aeroallergens have also been investigated as triggers of EE. Traditional allergy-testing methods, including skin prick testing and specific IgE testing, have been used to identify food and environmental allergies. However, new studies suggest that patch testing could add to diagnostic accuracy in EE because the disorder might not be a classic type I allergic response. Although studies of treatment of adults with EE have thus far focused on swallowed fluticasone proprionate, many trials in children have assessed the efficacy of food elimination and elemental diets. These diets, which have been extremely successful in reducing symptoms, have also been shown to induce histological improvement and remission. No similar studies have been conducted in adults; the tolerability of such an intervention may prove more difficult in this population. This article reviews the underlying pathophysiology of EE and describes evolving options for more accurately identifying food and environmental allergies. We also discuss the pediatric trials using food elimination and avoidance diets and suggest that this type of intervention may be an important area of future research in the adult population.

Eosinophilic oesophagitis and coeliac disease: is there an association?

AIM: To report a series of 17 children affected by eosinophilic oesophagitis. Six of them also received a diagnosis of coeliac disease. METHODS: Seventeen children with history of dyspeptic symptoms were investigated. RESULTS: Six patients (M/F:2/4; mean age +/- s.d.: 5.6 +/- 1.3 years, range: 4-7 years; Group A) affected by eosinophilic oesophagitis also received a diagnosis of coeliac disease. The other 11 children (M/F:10/1, mean age +/- s.d.:7.5 +/- 2.3 years, range: 4-10 years, Group B) were affected solely by eosinophilic oesophagitis. All children underwent a change in dietary regimen. Group A received a gluten-free diet. Group B attempted dietary restriction based on the allergy testing results. After 6 months follow-up, all patients in Group A showed a complete disappearance of symptoms and three of them, who underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, showed histologic remission. Patients from Group B had moderate clinical improvement and in seven of them (64%) a repeated upper gastrointestinal endoscopy showed a statistically significant reduction in eosinophilic infiltration. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first reported group of patients with an association between coeliac disease and eosinophilic oesophagitis. To date, it is not possible to exclude that in a subgroup of children with coeliac disease the oesophageal eosinophilic infiltration could be caused by coeliac disease itself.

Treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis: drugs, diet, or dilation?

A number of recent studies have demonstrated that a variety of treatments effectively improve symptoms and histology in the majority of patients with eosinophilic esophagitis. Therapeutic options include pharmacologic treatments, such as oral and topical corticosteroids and leukotriene-receptor antagonists. In children, the high response rates to dietary modification and elimination suggest that certain foods may serve as environmental triggers for the eosinophilic infiltration. Because many adults present with strictures, endoscopic esophageal dilation is another management modality. Despite these treatment options, several controversies exist in the recommended treatment strategy. Whether the goal of therapy is resolution of symptoms, tissue eosinophilia, or both remains uncertain owing to the paucity of data on the natural history of the condition. Furthermore, important differences in the clinical presentations of eosinophilic esophagitis in children and adults point toward the possible need for different treatment approaches in the two patient populations.

Eosinophilic esophagitis in adults--no clinical relevance of wheat and rye sensitizations.

BACKGROUND: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EE) is often associated with concomitant atopic diseases. In children with EE in whom food allergens have been identified as causative factors, elemental and elimination diets result in an improvement or resolution of symptoms. Most adult EE patients are sensitized to aeroallergens, which cross-react with plant-derived food allergens, most commonly to grass pollen and cereals. AIMS OF THE STUDY: To investigate the clinical relevance of the sensitization to wheat and rye, and the efficacy of an allergen-specific elimination diet in adult EE patients. METHODS: Six patients (five men, one women) with permanently active EE sensitized to grass pollen and the cereals wheat and rye underwent a double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge and were kept on an elimination diet avoiding wheat and rye for 6 weeks. RESULTS: The challenge tests with wheat and rye did not provoke any EE symptoms in all patients. The elimination diet failed in reducing disease activity. Although one patient noticed an improvement of symptoms, endoscopic and histopathologic findings remained unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: In adult EE patients, sensitization to wheat and rye does not seem causative for EE. Elimination diet is not a reliable and efficient therapeutic measure in EE patients sensitized to wheat and rye. Low specific immunoglobulin-E levels to wheat and rye may be a consequence of the underlying grass pollen allergy.

Effect of six-food elimination diet on clinical and histologic outcomes in eosinophilic esophagitis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: In children, eosinophilic esophagitis (EE) is predominantly, but not exclusively, a food-hypersensitivity disorder. A crystalline amino acid-based elemental diet (ELED) formula currently remains the most effective nutritional treatment in inducing clinical and histologic remission. However, compliance with an exclusive, poor-tasting liquid formulation is difficult. METHODS: This retrospective observational study assessed the short-term clinical and histologic responses of 2 cohorts of children with EE evaluated during 2 different time periods: one was treated with the standard 6-food elimination diet (SFED) and the other was treated with ELED. Of the 60 children who met the inclusion criteria and were compliant with the dietary protocol, 35 were treated with a diet excluding cow-milk protein, soy, wheat, egg, peanut, and seafood while allowing all other table foods and 25 were treated exclusively with ELED. Repeat esophageal biopsy specimens were obtained at least 6 weeks later. RESULTS: Twenty-six of 35 (74%) in the SFED group and 22 of 25 (88%) in the ELED group achieved significant improvement of esophageal inflammation (

Eosinophilic esophagitis.

BACKGROUND: Esophagitis is an increasingly diagnosed disease. Patients with gastroesophagic reflux, dysphagia, vomiting or abdominal pain, with a torpid response to the treatment, could be suffering from it. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A 37 year-old male patient with background of gastroesophagic reflux and dysphagia for solids since 2002, self-limited diarrhea episodes and intolerance to alcoholic drinks due to epigastric pain. Skin prick tests, specific IgE, histamine release test and basophil activation test were carried out. RESULTS: Skin prick test to the usual allergens with negative result; prick-prick tests to egg white and yolk, milk and apple with positive result to egg white; total serum IgE within normal levels, specific IgE to egg white with positive result; histamine release test (HRT) and basophil activation test (BAT) with positive result to egg white and yolk. CONCLUSION: The patient was diagnosed eosinophilic esophagitis. The commercial food extracts have a great variability in their allergenic composition, which could result in false negative results in the prick test. Prick-prick with the natural food is a more sensitive technique than prick in the diagnosis of food allergy. There are other useful in vitro techniques, apart from specific IgE, in the diagnosis of food allergy. In our case, an exclusion diet of the involved food was more effective than other treatments for remission of the symptoms.

Eosinophilic esophagitis / Esofagitis eosinofílica

Background: Esophagitis is an increasingly diagnosed disease. Patients with gastroesophagic reflux, dysphagia, vomiting or abdominal pain, with a torpid response to the treatment, could be suffering from it. Material and methods: A 37 year-old male patient with background of gastroesophagic reflux and dysphagia for solids since 2002, self-limited diarrhea episodes and intolerance to alcoholic drinks due to epigastric pain. Skin prick tests, specific IgE, histamine release test and basophil activation test were carried out. Results: Skin prick test to the usual allergens with negative result; prick-prick tests to egg white and yolk, milk and apple with positive result to egg white; total serum IgE within normal levels, specific IgE to egg white with positive result; histamine release test (HRT) and basophil activation test (BAT) with positive result to egg white and yolk. Conclusion: The patient was diagnosed eosinophilic esophagitis. The commercial food extracts have a great variability in their allergenic composition, which could result in false negative results in the prick test. Prick-prick with the natural food is a more sensitive technique than prick in the diagnosis of food allergy. There are other useful in vitro techniques, apart from specific IgE, in the diagnosis of food allergy. In our case, an exclusion diet of the involved food was more effective than other treatments for remission of the symptoms

Introducción: La esofagitis eosinofílica es una entidad cada vez más diagnosticada. Pacientes que presentan síntomas de reflujo gastroesofágico, disfagia, vómitos o dolor abdominal con mala respuesta al tratamiento, pueden tener esta enfermedad. Presentamos el caso de un paciente varón de 37 años con antecedente de reflujo gastroesofágico y disfagia para sólidos desde 2002, episodios diarreicos autolimitados e intolerancia al alcohol por dolor epigástrico, que fue diagnosticado de esofagitis eosinofílica. Material y métodos: En el estudio alergológico realizado se efectuaron pruebas cutáneas (Prick) a los alergenos habituales con resultado negativo; pruebas cutáneas (Prick-Prick) frente a clara y yema de huevo, leche y manzana con resultado positivo frente a clara; IgE sérica total que resultó dentro de la normalidad, IgE específica frente a clara de huevo con resultado positivo; Test de Liberación de Histamina (TLH) y Test de Activación de Basófilos (TAB) con resultado positivo frente a clara y yema. Conclusion: Los extractos comerciales a alimentos presentan gran variabilidad en su composición alergénica, lo que puede dar resultados falsamente negativos en el prick. El prick-prick con el alimento en estado natural es una técnica más sensible y que ha demostrado una rentabilidad diagnóstica mayor que el prick en el diagnóstico de alergia a alimentos. Existen otras técnicas in vitro además de la IgE específica que sirven para el diagnóstico de la alergia alimentaria. En nuestro caso, una dieta de exclusión del alimento implicado resultó ser más determinante que otros tratamientos para la resolución de los síntomas

Eosinophilic esophagitis: a 10-year experience in 381 children.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a disorder characterized by a severe, isolated eosinophilic infiltration of the esophagus unresponsive to aggressive acid blockade but responsive to the removal of dietary antigens. We present information relating to our 10-year experience in children diagnosed with EoE. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study between January 1, 1994, and January 1, 2004, to evaluate all patients diagnosed with EoE. Clinical symptoms, demographic data, endoscopic findings, and the results of various treatment regimens were collected and evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 381 patients (66% male, age 9.1 +/- 3.1 years) were diagnosed with EoE: 312 presented with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux; 69 presented with dysphagia. Endoscopically, 68% of patients had a visually abnormal esophagus; 32% had a normal-appearing esophagus despite a severe histologic esophageal eosinophilia. The average number of esophageal eosinophils (per 400 x high power field) proximally and distally were 23.3 +/- 10.5 and 38.7 +/- 13.3, respectively. Corticosteroids significantly improved clinical symptoms and esophageal histology; however, upon their withdrawal, the symptoms and esophageal eosinophilia recurred. Dietary restriction or complete dietary elimination using an amino acid-based formula significantly improved both the clinical symptoms and esophageal histology in 75 and 172 patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Medications such as corticosteroids are effective; however, upon withdrawal, EoE recurs. The removal of dietary antigens significantly improved clinical symptoms and esophageal histology in 98% of patients.

Treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis with specific food elimination diet directed by a combination of skin prick and patch tests.

BACKGROUND: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EE) is a recently described disorder identified in patients with symptoms suggestive of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) but unresponsive to conventional reflux therapies. Therapies have included corticosteroids, elemental diet, and diet restriction. We report our experience with skin prick and atopy patch testing and food elimination diets in patients diagnosed as having EE. OBJECTIVE: To identify food antigens that cause EE and the characteristics of patients who respond to food elimination vs those who are unresponsive. METHODS: Patients diagnosed as having EE had restricted diets based on skin prick and atopy patch testing results. Additional biopsies were performed after 4 to 8 weeks of restricted diet. Demographics, atopic tendencies, and food antigens were identified retrospectively in our food allergy database. RESULTS: A total of 146 patients diagnosed as having EE were evaluated with skin prick and atopy patch testing. Thirty-nine patients had unequivocal demonstration of food causing EE, with normalization of biopsy results on elimination and reoccurrence on reintroduction. An additional 73 patients, for a total 112 (77%) of 146 patients, had resolution of their EE as demonstrated by biopsy results. Fifteen (10%) of 146 patients were nonresponders manifested by no significant reduction in esophageal eosinophils despite restricted diet based on skin prick and atopy patch testing. Egg, milk, and soy were identified most frequently with skin prick testing, whereas corn, soy, and wheat were identified most frequently with atopy patch testing. CONCLUSION: In more than 75% of patients with EE, both symptoms and esophageal inflammation can be significantly improved with dietary elimination of foods. Skin prick and atopy patch testing can help identify foods in most patients.